The LA Dodgers Claim the Championship, However for Latino Supporters, It's Complex
In the eyes of Natalia Molina and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning highlight of the World Series didn't happen during the tense finale last Saturday, when her team executed multiple dramatic escape feat after another and then prevailing in overtime over the opposing team.
It happened in the previous game, when two supporting athletes, Kike Hernández and Miguel Rojas, executed a electrifying, decisive play that simultaneously upended many negative stereotypes promoted about Latinos in the past decades.
The play itself was stunning: Hernández charged in from the outfield to snag a ball he at first misjudged in the stadium lights, then threw it to the infield to secure another, decisive out. Rojas, positioned nearby, received the ball moments before a opposing player collided with him, knocking him to the ground.
This was not just a remarkable sporting achievement, possibly the decisive turn in momentum in the team's favor after appearing for much of the series like the weaker side. To her, it was exhilarating, politically and culturally, a much-required morale boost for Latinos and for the city after months of enforcement actions, security forces patrolling the neighborhoods, and a steady stream of negativity from official sources.
"Kike and Miggy presented this alternative story," explained Molina. "Everyone witnessed Latinos displaying an contagious pride and joy in what they do, being leaders on the team, exhibiting a distinct kind of confidence. They are bombastic, they're yelling, they're taking off their shirts."
"It was such a contrast with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos detained and chased down. It's so easy to be disheartened these days."
Not that it's exactly simple to be a team fan nowadays – for Molina or for the many of other Latinos who show up faithfully to home games and fill up as many as 50% of the stadium's fifty thousand seats per game.
A Mixed Connection with the Team
After aggressive immigration raids started in Los Angeles in early June, and national guard units were deployed into the city to react to ensuing demonstrations, two of the local sports teams promptly released messages of solidarity with immigrant families – but not the Dodgers.
Management has said the organization want to stay away of politics – a stance colored, possibly, by the fact that a sizable minority of the supporters, including Latinos, are followers of current political figures. After considerable public pressure, the team subsequently committed $one million in aid for individuals personally affected by the raids but made no public criticism of the administration.
White House Visit and Past Heritage
Months earlier, the team did not delay in accepting an offer to celebrate their previous World Series win at the official residence – a decision that local writers labeled as "pathetic … weak … and contradictory", considering the team's pride in having been the pioneering professional franchise to end the color barrier in the mid-20th century and the frequent references of that history and the values it represents by executives and current and former athletes. Several players such as the manager had voiced reluctance to go to the event during the initial period but either changed their minds or succumbed to demands from the organization.
Business Control and Supporter Dilemmas
An additional complication for supporters is that the Dodgers are controlled by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose investments, as per sources and its own published balance sheets, include a stake in a detention corporation that operates detention facilities. The group's executives has said many times that it aims to stay out of politics, but its critics say the silence – and the investment – are their own form of compliance to current policies.
These factors contribute to significant mixed feelings among Hispanic supporters in particular – feelings that emerged even in the excitement of this year's hard-fought World Series victory and the ensuing outpouring of Dodgers support across the city.
"Is it okay to support the team?" area columnist one observer reflected at the beginning of the playoffs in an elegant article pondering on "Dodger blue in our blood, but uncertainty in our minds". He couldn't finally bring himself to view the championship, but he still felt strongly, to the extent that he decided his personal boycott must have given the squad the luck it needed to win.
Distinguishing the Players from the Management
Numerous supporters who share Galindo's reservations seem to have concluded that they can keep to support the players and its roster of international stars, including the Japanese megastar a key player, while pouring scorn on the organization's business leadership. At no place was this more clear than at the victory celebration at the home venue on Monday, when the packed audience cheered in support of the manager and his players but jeered the executive and the top official of the investors.
"The executives in suits don't get to take our boys in blue from us," Molina said. "We have been with the team longer than they have."
Historical Context and Community Effect
The problem, however, runs deeper than just the team's present owners. The deal that moved the former franchise to Los Angeles in the late 1950s required the city razing three low-income Latino neighborhoods on a hill above downtown and then transferring the land to the team for a small part of its actual worth. A track on a 2005 record that documents the story has an low-income parking attendant at the venue revealing that the house he forfeited to eviction is now a part of the field.
Gustavo Arellano, perhaps southern California most widely followed Latino columnist and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the long, dysfunctional relationship between the team and its audience. He describes the team the popular snack of baseball, "a business organization with an excessive, even unhealthy devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been exploiting its supporters for decades.
"They have acted around Latino fans while profiting from them with the other for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano noted over the summer, when calls to boycott the organization over its lack of response to the enforcement actions were upended by the uncomfortable reality that turnout at matches remained steady, even at the height of the protests when the city center was under to a evening restriction.
International Stars and Community Connections
Separating the squad from its corporate owners is not a easy matter, {